USPTO serial 85105582
ME! CREATED FOR THE HORSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ME! CREATED FOR THE HORSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Kosmal McCart
RACHEL KOSMAL MCCART EQUINE LEGAL SOLUTIONS, PC24150 S HIGHLAND CREST DRBEAVERCREEK, OR 97004-9716UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Conditioners; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Deodorizers for pets; Gel for horse and dog hair; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, horse and dog shampoo, conditioner, detangler, shine products and stain remover; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair emollients; Hair fixers; Hair gel; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair gels; Hair lacquers; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hair masks; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sheen spray; Hair spray; Hair sprays; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair tonic; Hair tonics; Lotions for horse and dog hair and skin; Mousse for horse and dog hair and skin; Non-medicated balms for use on horse and dog hair and skin; Non-medicated grooming preparations for horses and dogs, namely, shampoo, conditioner, detangler, shine products and stain remover; Non-medicated hair serums; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Non-medicated serums for use on horse and dog hair; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Pet care kits comprising shampoo, conditioner, body spray; Pet fragrances; Pet odor removers; Pet shampoo; Pet shampoo and conditioner; Pet stain removers; Pomades for horse and dog hair; Scent eliminating shampoo and soap for use associated with hunting and outdoor recreation; Shampoo-conditioners; Shampoos; Styling foam for hair; Styling paste for hair | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2006 |
| 005 | Herbal anti-itch and sore skin ointment for pets; Sore skin ointment for pets | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |