CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for METRONOMIC BIOFEEDBACK PUMP (MBP)

USPTO serial 85105618

METRONOMIC BIOFEEDBACK PUMP (MBP)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METRONOMIC BIOFEEDBACK PUMP (MBP)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel L. Dawes

DANIEL L. DAWES DAWES PATENT LAW GROUP5200 WARNER AVE STE 106HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649-4029UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and units for dosage, measuring and monitoring, namely, drug delivery devices and systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 30, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 5, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 29, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance