Drawing for HEALTHCARE ASSET MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 85105718

HEALTHCARE ASSET MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HEALTHCARE ASSET MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aletta Dekkers

ALETTA DEKKERS OFFICE OF ALETTA DEKKERS950 RIDGE ROADSTONEY CREEK, ON, L8J2X4CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for property and asset management, property project management and property operations management in respect of buildings and property of the userACTIVE—
041Computer training services for licensed customers, namely, the training of the user in the use and application of computer software for property managementACTIVE—
042Computer technology support services, namely, help desk and hosting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 13, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 10, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 15, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 15, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance