Drawing for FARMERS MUTUAL HAIL

USPTO serial 85105855

FARMERS MUTUAL HAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARMERS MUTUAL HAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Blakely Glasgow

RICHARD BLAKELY GLASGOW WRIGHT LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP200 WEST CAPITOL AVENUESUITE 2300LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services, namely, writing multi-peril crop insurance, crop hail insurance and re-insurance underwriting in the fields of crop and international businessACTIVEMar 14, 1893

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 25, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 2, 2014RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 27, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 17, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 17, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 27, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 27, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 24, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance