USPTO serial 85106061
ALL'S WELL THAT EATS WELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALL'S WELL THAT EATS WELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq.
Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq. Moses & Singer LLP405 Lexington AvenueThe Chrysler BuildingNew York, NY 10174Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved and prepared fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; edible oils and fats; frozen or refrigerated vegan entrees consisting primarily of combinations of meat substitutes or poultry substitutes, pasta, grain, rice, vegetables and cheese; frozen or refrigerated vegan appetizers; frozen or refrigerated vegan enchiladas, tortellini; sandwiches with various fillings and snacks; dry mixes consisting primarily of grains, seeds, peanuts, dehydrated vegetables, and seasonings to be used in making meatless burgers; dry prepared chili mix containing whole grains, dehydrated vegetables, spices, and soy flour; dry mixes consisting primarily of whole grains, spices, herbs, and flours used to make falafel; instant soup mixes; dry mix for preparing instant black beans and refried beans; dry mixes consisting primarily of dehydrated potatoes, dehydrated vegetables, and seasonings to be used in making potato dishes; dry mixes consisting primarily of rice, beans, lentils, dehydrated vegetables, and seasonings to be used in making meals in a cup and dry mix for preparing instant hummus; vegetable, soy or gluten based meat alternatives; vegetable, soy or gluten based burger patties; meat substitutes of either formed or unformed texture and poultry substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |