Drawing for TRUSTMARK

USPTO serial 85106215

TRUSTMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUSTMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bridgette Fitzpatrick

Bridgette Fitzpatrick Hearst Corporation300 West 57th StreetNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING RATINGS OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES SOLD BY OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF FOOD, HEALTH AND FITNESS, LIFESTYLE, RELATIONSHIPS, HOME, AND STYLE AND BEAUTY (EXCLUDING THE FIELDS OF BANKING, INVESTMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES) BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF READERS OF A GENERAL INTEREST MAGAZINE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 29, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 1, 2012CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 18, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 31, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 11, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 28, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 28, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance