USPTO serial 85106274
GUADALUPANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUADALUPANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
21000 Mexicali, B. C., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant A. Monachino
GRANT A. MONACHINO McDonald Hopkins, LLC600 Superior Avenue, E., Ste 2100Cleveland, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toilet soap, cosmetics, shampoos, hair lotions, cream and lotions for face and body, essentials oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical items, namely dietary supplements and herbal supplements; medicinal herbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring drugs, medicinal herbs, cosmetics, gifts, toys, and a wide variety of consumer goods of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |