Drawing for SCORPIONFISH OCEANWEAR

USPTO serial 85106559

SCORPIONFISH OCEANWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCORPIONFISH OCEANWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew D. Francis

MATTHEW D. FRANCIS WATSON ROUNDS5371 KIETZKE LNRENO, NV 89511-2083UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, button-down shirts, shorts, board shorts, rash guards, wetsuits, bathing suits, hats, and visorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance