Drawing for GKN>

USPTO serial 85106812

GKN>

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GKN>?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. LaBarge

RICHARD M. LABARGE MARSHALL, GERSSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DTRIVE STE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Bearings, namely, wheel bearings for land vehicles and gear wheels; tubes and hoses, namely, power steering hoses; connectors, namely, connectors for drivelines, torque management devices, and power and torque transmission devices for land vehicles; shafts, namely, driveshafts for land vehicles; propeller shafts; connecting shafts, namely, drive shafts for land vehicles; universal and double universal joints for land vehicles; constant velocity joints for land vehicles; viscous and other couplings namely, couplings for torque management devices and power and torque transmission devices for land vehicles; flexible shaft couplings for land vehicles; cardan type and Hooke's type joints, namely, joints for land vehicles; transmissions for vehicles; bearing assemblies namely, bearings for land vehicles; steering mechanism joints and couplings; gears for vehicles and gearboxes; differentials for land vehicles; locking differentials for land vehicles; components, parts and fittings for land vehicles, namely, cross pieces, bearing cups, bearings, yokes, rubber boots, plastic boots, tubes, outer races, cages, balls and connecting shafts; wheels, wheel hubs and rims, axles and steering axles, all for vehicles; hitches and connecting couplings for vehicles namely, coupling frames, lower links, upper links, coupling and towing hooks, lift links for lower links, ball guide cones, drive shaft couplers; chassis systems, namely, chassis for land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 19, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 13, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 17, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 7, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance