Drawing for ROOM BY ROOM

USPTO serial 85106921

ROOM BY ROOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROOM BY ROOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine E. Maxson

Catherine E. Maxson Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third AvenueSuite 2200Seattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, A CONTINUING PROGRAM ABOUT INTERIOR DESIGN AND DECORATING, ACCESSIBLE BY RADIO, TELEVISION, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS, WIRELESS NETWORKS, SATELLITE, AUDIO VIDEO, AND COMPUTER NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 13, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 28, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 28, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance