Drawing for SANKEYS

USPTO serial 85106978

SANKEYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SANKEYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANET B. LINN

JANET B. LINN ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT STREET-44TH FLU.S. STEEL TOWERPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-2788

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Musical sound and musical video recordings and downloadable podcasts in the field of music associated with a night clubACTIVE—
025Clothing merchandise, namely, hats, t-shirts and jackets associated with a night clubACTIVE—
041Night clubs; dance club services; entertainment services, namely, live music concerts, provision of information relating to music, live performances by a musical band, dance events, dance performances, disc jockey services, providing nondownloadable prerecorded music online via a global computer network, providing commentary and articles about music online via a global computer network, master of ceremony services, and entertainment in the nature of presentations of live show performances featuring variety, comedy and magic performancesACTIVE—
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 8, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 7, 2012WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2012WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 27, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 5, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 30, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance