USPTO serial 85107490
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santiago, Las Condes, CL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Damon Ashcraft
J. DAMON ASHCRAFT SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E VAN BUREN ST # 10PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2223UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit card services; credit services related to tourism and travel by any means, via air, sea or land; investment fund management; securities and commodities brokerage; money exchange agency services; investment compensation, investment clearing and investment trust services; services provided by a real estate agency; leasing services; brokerage services; real estate brokerage; real estate affairs, including the exploitation and acquisition of land; financing of all kinds of enterprises, including commercial enterprises; real estate company services; real estate management and leasing; real estate and capital valuation services; financial advisory and consultancy; stocks and bonds brokerage; securities agency and clearing agency services; charitable fundraising | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |