USPTO serial 85107880
CAVEMAN NUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAVEMAN NUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WALNUT CREEK, CA
WALNUT CREEK, CA
MARTINEZ, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID HOCHMAN
DAVID HOCHMAN Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP11400 W. Olympic Blvd., 9th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary food supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAVEMAN FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CAVEMAN FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BOB FRITZ
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CAVEMAN NUTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |