Drawing for MOTHER EARTH BREWING

USPTO serial 85108203

MOTHER EARTH BREWING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, ELIZABETH FLEMING
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTHER EARTH BREWING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Sar

REBECCA L CAGE BROOKS PIERCE MCLENDON HUMPHREY & LEONARD LLPPO BOX 26000GREENSBORO, NC 27420-6000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer, excluding both organic beer and beer comprised solely of organic components; Brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beer, excluding both organic beer and beer comprised solely of organic componentsACTIVEOct 31, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 17, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 15, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 16, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 26, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 26, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 26, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 31, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 25, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance