Drawing for ROYAL BEST

USPTO serial 85108222

ROYAL BEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL BEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecilia L. Yu

CECILIA L. YU LAW OFFICES OF CECILIA L. YU & ASSOCIATES17800 CASTLETON ST STE 383CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748-1790UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Powdered mixes for making desserts, namely, cakes, cheesecakes, custards, puddings, and flavored and sweetened gelatins; food condiments, namely, salt, pepper, soy sauce, and vinegar; seasoning mixes for soups; mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups, or powders used in the preparation of coffee, cocoa, and tea-based beveragesABANDONEDAug 6, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 4, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance