USPTO serial 85108461
MANTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maldonado, UY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
JUSTIN R YOUNG DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 NORTH WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education courses in the fields of hospitality, hotel services, concierge services, housekeeping, tourism, health, spa services, body care techniques, entertainment and casino gaming; providing training in the fields of hospitality, hotel services, concierge services, tourism, spa services, body care technique. entertainment and casino gaming; entertainment in the nature of music, arts, variety shows, fashion shows, dance shows and performances, cultural shows, art shows, technological shows, music shows, theater shows and productions, artistic performances; entertainment in the nature of conducting parties; entertainment services, namely, casino gaming; organizing poker competitions; organizing sporting events, namely, water sports exhibitions and competitions, tennis competitions, polo competitions, boxing exhibitions and competition, boat races, rally competitions, marathons, beach soccer competitions, rugby exhibitions and competitions, volleyball exhibitions and competitions, running and walking exhibitions and competitions; organizing and hosting of events for cultural purposes; organization of cultural shows and exhibitions; organization of art shows; organizing exhibitions for educational, cultural, sporting and entertainment purposes; organizing exhibitions in the field of technology; organizing exhibitions in the field of books; conducting lectures and seminars on topics of general interest; conducting and providing facilities for special events featuring casino and gaming contests and tournaments; providing facilities for recreation activities; providing facilities for educational conventions; providing facilities for movies, shows, plays, music or educational training; provision of cinema facilities; providing facilities for sports competitions; providing fitness and exercise facilities; providing sports facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | temporary accommodation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |