Drawing for DENIM & DENIM

USPTO serial 85108655

DENIM & DENIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENIM & DENIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas D. Foster

Thomas D. Foster TDFoster - Intellectual Property Law11622 El Camino Real, Suite 100San Diego, CA 92130-2051UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025men's, women's and children's clothing made from denim, namely, pants, shirts, hooded sweat shirtsACTIVEJun 30, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 29, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2012AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2012IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 11, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 11, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 11, 2012GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 11, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2011AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 19, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 18, 2011EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 19, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 19, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance