Drawing for IBL.TV

USPTO serial 85108810

IBL.TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IBL.TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Grace

DAVID W. GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, ongoing television programs in the field of sports; ongoing television programs presented over the Internet in the field of sports; providing ongoing entertainment programs in the field of sports accessible by satellite, television, cable television, Internet, wireless networks, and through transmission of audio and/or video signals to any type of visual display device or any delivery mechanism; production and distribution of television programs; providing an Internet web site featuring information about sportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 17, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 9, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 15, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 27, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 27, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 16, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance