USPTO serial 85109506
BLUE + GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUE + GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj Abhyanker
Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamps; lanterns; lighting fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Bags, namely, all-purpose carrying bags, reusable shopping bags, garment bags for travel, all-purpose carrying bags, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, handbags, beach bags, cosmetic bags sold empty, diaper bags, duffel bags, mesh shopping bags, messenger bags, tote bags, traveling bags, knapsacks, rucksacks, fanny packs, sports packs, backpacks, purses; animal carriers; animal leashes; dog apparel, namely, clothing for dogs | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture; bookcases; coat racks; cushions; fireplace screens; magazine racks; mirrors; picture frames; pillows; plant stands; wine racks; wood boxes; works of art made of plaster or wood; baker's racks; benches; hampers; non-metal plant hangers; non-metal step stools; folding partition screens; umbrella stands; polyresin wall plaques; beds for household pets; non-metal pet tags | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Baskets of wicker or wood; picnic baskets sold empty; candle holders; candle snuffers; containers for household use; drinking vessels; bowls; plates; towel bars; carving boards; napkin rings; trays for domestic purposes; trivets; serving utensils, namely, forks, tongs, turners; wall plaques made of china and earthenware | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Bath mats; floor mats; rugs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alok International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alok International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named BLUE + GREEN
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |