USPTO serial 85110466
M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul C. Van Slyke
PAUL C. VAN SLYKE LOCKE LORD BISSELL & LIDDELL LLP600 TRAVIS STHOUSTON, TX 77002-3009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, gold or sterling silver pins, brooches, rings, earrings, charms, bracelets, bangles, ring bands, necklaces, pendants, with or without beads, pearls, and precious and semi-precious gemstones | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring jewelry, namely, gold or sterling silver rings, earrings, charms, bracelets, bangles, bands, necklaces, pendants, pins, brooches, with or without beads, pearls, and precious and semi-precious gemstones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |