USPTO serial 85111035
HSIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HSIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG PC1600 JFK BLVD FL 2PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cellular phones; smart phones; mobile computers; mobile television receivers; mobile TV sets; netbooks; computers; PC tablet; telematics apparatus, namely, wireless internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function; portable telephones; portable televisions; wireless adapter modules for computers; wireless connectivity computer hardware modules; GPS modules; audio amplifier modules; video modules composed of computer monitors; electric sensors; portable navigation devices, namely, computers; GPS navigation devices; voltage regulators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |