USPTO serial 85111517
ILIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ILIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IRVINE, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anessa Owen Kramer
Anessa Owen Kramer Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; prerecorded compact discs featuring music; prerecorded minidisks featuring music; prerecorded audio loops, namely, prerecorded music; prerecorded electronic media, namely, DVDs, audio tapes; MP3s featuring recorded music and recorded music video consisting of musical performances; downloadable musical sound recordings; downloadable musical video recordings; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines and newsletters on music, musicians, musical artists, musical technology, song writing, musical composition and entertainment; audio loudspeakers; amplifiers; audio equipment, namely, receivers, stereos, speakers, equalizers, cross overs; electric audio playback units with lights and speakers; stereo tuners; guitar amplifiers; guitar cables; guitar effects processors; digital storage devices, namely, blank computer disks, computer disk drives, prerecorded video tapes featuring music, blank CD-ROMs all for audio and video recording; karaoke machines; digital audio workstations, namely, personal recording studio comprised of eight track players, effects processors, digital audio recorders and players; signal converters; input "break-out" cables; remix stations for mixing digital audio files and music; disc jockey equipment, namely, microphones, turntables, remixing headphones, music mixers, fog machines, light controllers; CD players and recorders, digital audio players and recorders; flash memory cards; hard drives for computers; audio equipment, namely, input/output mixing boards; computer control surfaces, namely, touch pads; Internet enabled recorders, namely, digital audio and video recorders for recording and playing music and digital files over the Internet; music analog and digital synthesizers; special effects processors for processing audio and digital data; digital signal processors; downloadable ring tones via a global computer network and wireless devices; music and sound samplers; downloadable computer software for management of personal information and preferences as to music, video and entertainment products; downloadable computer software for use in authoring, transmitting, receiving, editing, extracting, encoding, decoding, playing, storing and organizing audio and video; downloadable computer software to enable the hosting and distribution of digital content over computer networks; downloadable computer software to enable the creation of digital content for distribution over computer networks; downloadable computer software to enable audio, video, text and graphical content to be accessed on-demand or via a subscription over computer networks; computer screen server software; downloadable graphics, wallpaper, games and music via a global computer network and wireless devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |