Drawing for SILVER

USPTO serial 85113618

SILVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN E. TURUNG

BRIAN E. TURUNG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated mouth and oral care products, namely, toothpaste, teeth whitening strips impregnated with teeth whitening preparations, and breath freshening sprays; non-medicated gum; non-medicated mouth and oral lozenges; non-medicated mouth and oral rinses and washes, namely, anti-cavity mouth rinses, cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; non-medicated breath mints and mouth and oral mints, namely, breath mints for use as a breath freshener; non-medicated mouth or oral gels, namely, tooth gels, tooth whiteners for cosmetic purposes comprised of neutral sodium fluoride sustained release gel, tooth whitening gels; non-medicated mouth and oral moisturizers for cosmetic uses, namely, lip repairersACTIVE—
032Non-medicated mouth care products, namely, drink powders used in the preparation of isotonic sports drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 17, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance