USPTO serial 85113671
ECO-COOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO-COOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm J. Rich
NORM J. RICH FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K Street, N.W.SIXTH FLOORWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cooling apparatus and cooling systems for internal combustion engines and alternative drives such as electric motor and fuel cell for motor vehicles, namely, cooling modules, oil modules, exhaust gas recirculation modules and parts therefor, namely, coolant coolers, radiators, refrigerant condensers, charge air coolers, oil coolers, fans and fan hoods, fan drives, fan couplings/clutches, fluid friction couplings as well as exhaust gas heat transfer means, exhaust gas recirculation valves, fuel coolers, coolant pumps, coolant hoses and auxiliary heaters | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Systems for the measurement and control of coolant temperature in land motor vehicles comprising sensors, Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) sensors and actuators, systems for temperature and climate control comprising sensors and actuators, operating controllers and electrical controllers, sensors for measuring air and coolant temperature, Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) auxiliary heaters and Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) regulators; land vehicle instrument panels comprising dash controls; coolant thermostats | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems and their parts for automotive vehicles, namely, air conditioning systems comprising air conditioners, blowers, fan wheels, fan drives, indoor filters, operating controllers and electrical controllers, pneumatic and electrical actuators, sensors for measuring air and coolant temperature, valves, heat transfer means such as heater cores, refrigerant evaporators and condensers, Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) auxiliary heaters and Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) regulators, refrigerant expansion valves, coolant pumps, and refrigerant compressors, refrigerant tubing, refrigerant lines, collectors and dryers for refrigerants, air conditioning cooling modules | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicle console parts, namely, air vents, crossbeams, wiring harnesses, air ducts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Behr GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Behr GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ECO-COOL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |