USPTO serial 85115544
SCRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2012
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Reading, Berkshire, GB
Reading, Berkshire, GB
Reading, Berkshire, GB
Reading, Berkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Witzel
Mary Witzel Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC211 Church Street SELeesburg, VA 20175Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Operating software for use on military machines; operating software for use on remote control vehicles; operating software for use on autonomous vehicles; operating software for use on parts of vehicles that are autonomous | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Remote control land vehicles that are operator-controlled; land vehicles and structural parts of land vehicles that are autonomous for use in military and security applications; and remote control land vehicles and structural parts of land vehicles that are operator-controlled; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, land vehicles, airplanes, flying robot aircraft, hovercraft, boats, submarines, ships, and spacecraft; remote control land vehicles, manually-operated land vehicles and autonomous land vehicles; remote control vehicles for locomotion by air and water, namely, land vehicles, airplanes, flying robot aircraft, hovercraft, boats, submarines, ships and spacecraft; parts of remote-controlled land vehicles that are operator-controlled, namely, wheels of remote-controlled land vehicles, and electric motors for operating wheels of remote-controlled land vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Providing consultancy on how to manufacture robot machines, remote control vehicles, and autonomous vehicles or manually-operated vehicles; providing consultancy relating to the custom manufacture of robots to certain specifications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing training on how to operate and repair robot machines, remote control vehicles, autonomous vehicles and manually-operated vehicles; arranging and conducting workshops on the operation of robot machines, remote control vehicles, autonomous vehicles, and manually-operated vehicles; and practical training on and providing educational demonstrations on how to operate and repair robot machines or remote control vehicles, autonomous vehicles and manually-operated vehicles; and practical training on and providing educational demonstrations on how to assemble and manufacture parts of robot machines, remote control vehicles, autonomous vehicles, and manually-operated vehicles; and providing training on the development of robot machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing consultancy on the development of robot machines, remote control vehicles, autonomous vehicles and manually-operated vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Robosynthesis Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Robosynthesis Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Robosynthesis Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ROSS ROBOTICS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SCRAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 30, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |