USPTO serial 85116459
INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS PLANT STEM CELL SCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS PLANT STEM CELL SCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf
SHERRI L. ROHLF SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER,100 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, spray and sculpting gels, hair color, and waving lotions; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, eye shadow, foundation, blush, face powder, concealer, eye pencils, lip pencils and mascara; perfumes and colognes; incense and room fragrances; aromatherapy essential oils and scented essential oils that are used and/or distributed into the air through the use of aromatherapy products and air diffusers; non-medicated hair care, skin care and personal hygiene products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, baby wipes, moisturizers, lotions, cosmetics, cleansers, skin creams and perfumes and colognes for babies and pregnant women | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS PLANT STEM CELL SCIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |