USPTO serial 85117352
BADGEMASTER DISSOLVABLE EMBROIDERY FILMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4039597Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2011
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BADGEMASTER DISSOLVABLE EMBROIDERY FILMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Merrillville, IN
Merrillville, IN
Merrillville, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J. Chinlund
GREGORY J. CHINLUND MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606-6471UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Water soluble plastic film used as a support for embroidery or sewing on textiles and apparel and as a backing for embroidery or sewing on textiles and apparel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 11, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |