USPTO serial 85117452
CAN I AFFORD IT?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAN I AFFORD IT??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Suze Orman, Trustee of the SUZE ORMAN REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 11, 1998
Exton, PA
Other trademarks owned by Suze Orman, Trustee of the SUZE ORMAN REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 11, 1998
Suze Orman, Trustee of the SUZE ORMAN REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 11, 1998
Santa Monica, CA
Other trademarks owned by Suze Orman, Trustee of the SUZE ORMAN REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 11, 1998
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robin E. Silverman
Robin E. Silverman GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE711 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Board games; Card games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Suze Orman, Trustee of the SUZE ORMAN REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 11, 1998
- Other trademarks owned by Suze Orman, Trustee of the SUZE ORMAN REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 11, 1998
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named CAN I AFFORD IT?
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |