USPTO serial 85118232
PROPULSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROPULSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Longueuil, QUEBEC, CA
LONGUEUIL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 NORTH CAPITOL STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soups, preparations for making soups; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; cheese, yogurts, drinkable yogurts, fermented milk; fresh and mold-ripened cheese; edible oils and fats, margarine, butter, lard; mixed processed nuts, processed praline nuts; mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Rice; sugar, tapioca, sago; flour; bread, pastry; confectionery, chocolate, marzipan and caramel, cakes, donuts, biscuits and muffins; muffin mixes; cake and bread mixes; ice cream, sherbet and frozen candy; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; mustard; vinegar, vinaigrettes and prepared sauces, namely, béarnaise sauce, raclette sauce, curry sauce, Bordeaux sauce, Madeira sauce, Bolognese sauce, tomato sauce, ketchup, sorrel sauce; pasta, cornstarch, semolina, processed couscous; spices, salt, flower of salt; frozen yogurt; frozen yogurt confections; frozen yogurt mixes; frozen yogurt parfaits; parfaits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |