USPTO serial 85118499
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Boyd
40 BRINK STCRYSTAL LAKE, IL 60014-4371UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Packaging machines; Vacuum packaging machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Plastic bags for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Biodegradable non-paper packaging and shipping buffers for physical and thermal protection of items during shipping | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Packaging and parcelling of goods for transport purposes, namely, the packing of goods using sustainable or biodegradable packaging and shipping materials | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 25, 2010 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |