USPTO serial 85118692
DEFINITION INSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEFINITION INSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
El Segundo, CA
El Segundo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Kupersmith Larkin
JOAN KUPERSMITH LARKIN SEYFARTH SHAW LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 3500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in creation of visualizations in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing; Computer software for use in creation of visualizations in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing sold as a unit with an instruction manual; Computer software for use in creation of simulations in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing; Computer software for use in creation of simulations in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing sold as a unit with an instruction manual; Computer software for use in review of visualizations in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing; Computer software for use in review of visualizations in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing sold as a unit with an instruction manual; Computer software for use in review of simulations in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing; Computer software for use in review of simulations in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing sold as a unit with an instruction manual | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Manuals in the fields of requirements analysis, software design, software project planning, software development and software testing | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Conducting classes and seminars related to computer software; conducting on-line classes and training related to computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Business technology software consultation services; computer software consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by iRise
- Other trademarks owned by iRise
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DEFINITION INSIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |