Drawing for ROBUS

USPTO serial 85118721

ROBUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara A. Friedman

BARBARA A. FRIEDMAN EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC9801 WASHINGTONIAN BLVD., SUITE 750GAITHERSBURG, MD 20878UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Tripods, monopods, stands, supports and mounts for photo and video cameras; Parts and accessories for photo and digital camera tripods, monopods, supports, stands, and mounts, namely, straps, handles, cases, and carrying bags, all specially adapted for holding tripods, monopods, stands, supports and mounts for photo and video cameras, and parts and accessories therefor, heads, controls, shoulder supports, legs, stabilizers, attachment brackets and plates, spreaders, wheels, and dollies, all for tripods, monopods, stands, supports and mounts for photo and video camerasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 28, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 8, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 8, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 17, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 29, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 29, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance