Drawing for INTEGRATED COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS DESIGN

USPTO serial 85119024

INTEGRATED COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRATED COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon O. Nelson

JON O. NELSON BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.10 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-7437UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services; namely, scientific and engineering consulting and computer software aided design services for others based upon a system based technology that considers chemical interactions, processing techniques, microstructure and properties to achieve desired performance and further predicts property variations with confidence with respect to formulations, manufacturing and uses of ceramic and metal materialsACTIVEApr 9, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 25, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 24, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance