Drawing for ENERGYSMART

USPTO serial 85119403

ENERGYSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGYSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel R. Leeman

JOEL R. LEEMAN SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1616UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consulting services in the field of energy usage management; administering a multi site, real time energy usage information and data system, namely, providing a web-based on-line portal that provides customer access to their electric bill account information, energy usage pattern information, and energy consumption and usage data, for purposes of utility account business management and energy usage management; consulting services in the fields of energy consumption and usage conservation to improve energy efficiencyACTIVE—
042Energy usage monitoring, metering, and analysis of multi site, real time energy usage, namely, energy usage of commercial, industrial, governmental, and residential sites, namely, metering and monitoring electric power consumption by third parties for electric power providers; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use for remote monitoring, metering, and analysis of energy usage; consulting services in the fields of energy measurement to improve energy efficiencyACTIVEApr 9, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 10, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 15, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 15, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 15, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 15, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance