CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ARTJAMMING

USPTO serial 85119586

ARTJAMMING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTJAMMING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslye B. Davidson

LESLYE B. DAVIDSON DAVIDSON, DAVIDSON & KAPPEL, LLC589 8th Avenue, 16th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10018-6804

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002(Based on Intent to Use) Paints; paint powders; paint thickeners; paint thinners, paints for arts and crafts; metals in foil for painters; fabric paints; varnishesACTIVE—
016(Based on Intent to Use) Paper, cardboard; stationery; artist's materials, namely, artists' canvas for painting, drawing and sketching, easels, paint trays, paint stirrers, paint paddles, paint rollers, paint applicators in the nature of sponges, canvas for painting, drawing and sketching, art and craft paint kits, paint boxes, paint brushes; printed teaching materials in relation to art, painting and printingACTIVE—
041(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) Art studio services, namely, arranging, organizing, conducting and hosting painting sessions for groups and individualsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 19, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 17, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance