USPTO serial 85120242
PROJECT BLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROJECT BLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sunny S. Nassim
SUNNY S. NASSIM JACOBSON, RUSSELL, SALTZ & FINGERMAN, LLP10866 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1550LOS ANGELES, CA 90024-4306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Charitable services, namely, organizing and conducting charity events and auctions for charitable fundraising purposes, namely for the global environmental protection of the oceans and waterways; promoting initiatives to raise awareness for the global protection of oceans and waterways; promoting the goods and services of others through the use of advertising and marketing campaigns and distributing advertising materials; online retail store and mail order services in the fields of clothing, clothing accessories, shoes and slippers, leather goods, bags, jewelry, eyewear and surf products; promoting public awareness of the need to globally protect oceans and waterways and other environmental protection efforts; advertising and information distribution services, namely, providing classified advertising space via a global computer network; advertising and promotional services, namely, providing online databases promoting the goods and services of others over the Internet; providing a web site promoting awareness about oceans and waterways and the necessity in protecting them and various ways to support environmental causes; other services for raising awareness of environmental causes and charitable purposes, namely, developing and coordinating volunteer projects for charitable organizations, promoting the goods and services of others through the use of advertising and marketing campaigns for the purpose of promoting awareness about the global environmental protection of oceans and waterways; promotional services, namely, promoting the charities of others and their causes for the global environmental protection of oceans and waterways | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2007 |
| 036 | Charitable fundraising services, namely, providing a web site featuring the retail initiative for raising funds for the global protection of oceans and waterways by means of donating the proceeds of the sale of goods to charitable organizations; charitable fundraising services for the purpose of supporting charitable organizations that support the global environmental protection of oceans and waterways | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |