Drawing for COLOR BY CALIFORNIA

USPTO serial 85120425

COLOR BY CALIFORNIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR BY CALIFORNIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARISA I. URTEAGA-WATKINS, ESQUIRE

MARISA I. URTEAGA-WATKINS, ESQUIRE LAW OFFICES OF MARISA I. URTEAGA-WATKINS4200 CARNEGIE WAYSACRAMENTO, CA 95821UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, shirts, jerseys, sweat shirts, jackets, pants, night shirts, skirts, robes, caps, hats, visors, headbands, neckties, bowties, scarves, tops, tank-tops, hooded sweatshirts, polo shirts, collared shirts, camp shirts, and henley shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 22, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 21, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 19, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 29, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 22, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 14, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 14, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 14, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance