Drawing for SOUND SAFE

USPTO serial 85120954

SOUND SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUND SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harvey L. Yusman

Harvey L. Yusman Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, PC10 S. Broadway, Suite 2000St. Louis, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Building materials, namely, metal frameworks for architectural aluminum entrances and storefronts; frameworks of metal; metal curtain wallsACTIVE—
019Building materials and architectural products, namely, common sheet glass, laminated flat glass, wire glass, namely, a safety glass with reinforcing metal wire, insulated glass, heat-treated glass, non-metal spandrel, glass handrails and glass doorsACTIVE—
035Distributorship services in the field of glass, metal and non-metal glass-related products and metal and non-metal architectural productsACTIVE—
037Installation of custom skylight systems, commercial and residential glass products and auto glassACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 18, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 15, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance