USPTO serial 85121480
FABULOUS FINGERNAILS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FABULOUS FINGERNAILS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Conklin
PAUL W GARRITY SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Manicure kits consisting of nail files, nail clippers, nail and cuticle scissors, cuticle pushers, and tweezers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |