Drawing for I SUSHI BY PRANTALAY

USPTO serial 85122095

I SUSHI BY PRANTALAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with I SUSHI BY PRANTALAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Advertisement boards of paper or cardboard; informative printed matter, namely, informational sheets, flyers and leaflets featuring information on the nutritional values of foodsACTIVE—
029Frozen seafood, namely, packaged dinners and appetizers made primarily from seafood; ready-made seafood, namely, pre-packaged dinners consisting primarily of seafood, red snapper fillet, grouper fillet, silver line grunt fillet, Spanish mackerel fillet, sweetlip fillet, butter fish, Indian mackerel, salmon steak, red snapper head, grouper head, black tiger shrimp, white shrimp, squid fillet, sweet and sour tuna, tuna with garlic pepper, cooked crabmeat, scallop meat, shrimp paste, breaded fish, breaded squid, seasoning cooked mackerel, breaded shrimp, golden shrimp, fish cake, shrimp cake, squid cake, salmon slice steak; snacks made from seafood, namely, fish balls, shrimp balls, mixed seafood balls, shrimp ring, imitation crab stickACTIVE—
030Pasta salad with stir-fried seafood, pasta salad with seafood chop-sui; sushi, namely, makuro nigiri, salmon nigiri, saba nigiri, tanago nigiri, California maki, tago nigiri, shrimp roll, and California roll; ready made meals from primarily rice, namely, frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of rice, crab fried rice, seafood fried rice, shrimp tomyum fried rice, namprik tuna fried rice, fried rice and southern tuna turmeric, rice and southern tuna tua-kling, rice and northeastern salmon labb, rice and northeastern tuna tom zaab, rice and northern tuna hung-lay, rice and northern tuna namprik ong, rice and tuna curry, vegetable fried rice; yum seafood rice noodle; condiments, namely, cocktail sauce, seafood sauce, chili dipping sauce, basil leaves stir fry sauce, yum sauceACTIVE—
043Fast food restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance