Drawing for GOODWYN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

USPTO serial 85122143

GOODWYN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOODWYN RESEARCH INSTITUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

Cory M. Amron Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLaw@VorysColumbus, OH 43216-2255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business networking services for pharmaceutical manufacturers, medical device manufacturers, contract research organizations, contract research and site management organizations, institution and physician-sponsors, and organizations involved in clinical research studiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 15, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 16, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 15, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 15, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 21, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance