USPTO serial 85122222
MICHIGAN CEMENT COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4014110Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2011
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICHIGAN CEMENT COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Becker
JEFFREY M. BECKER HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP2323 VICTORY AVE STE 700DALLAS, TX 75219-7673UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Hydraulic cement | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 16, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 2, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |