USPTO serial 85122279
RAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas P. LaLone
DOUGLAS P LALONE RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVENUESUITE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational training seminars in the field of counseling troubled youth and distribution of course materials and training manuals in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |