CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ZEN DIEGO

USPTO serial 85122373

ZEN DIEGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZEN DIEGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph A. Mandour

JOSEPH A MANDOUR MANDOUR & ASSOCIATES APC16870 W BERNARDO DRIVESUITE 400SAN DIEGO, CA 92127-1678

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Apparel, namely, tops, bottoms, shirts, pants, shorts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, swim suits, jackets, skirts, overalls, socks, jerseys, underwear, sweaters, gloves, shoes, and hatsACTIVE—
044Health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services; medical spa services, namely, minimally and non-invasive cosmetic and body fitness therapiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 8, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2012TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 28, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 28, 2012OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 28, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 21, 2011OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance