Drawing for LEGAL INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 85122767

LEGAL INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LEGAL INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter A. Matos

PETER A MATOS MALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035legal employment recruiting and outsourcing services; business operations management consulting servicesABANDONEDAug 1, 2010
042custom software developmentABANDONEDAug 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 19, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 19, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 19, 2013OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 1, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 1, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance