Drawing for BURLYBRAND

USPTO serial 85122921

BURLYBRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURLYBRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Weyrauch

John M. Weyrauch Dicke, Billig & Czaja, PLLC100 South Fifth StreetSuite 2250Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008tool holders; multi-function hand tools comprised of a knife, bottle opener, pliers, saw blade, screw driver and file; multi-function hand tools comprised of a knife, bottle opener, socket and socket driver, screw driver, saw and file; multi-function hand tool comprised of a knife, bottle opener, saw blade, screw driver, pliers and file; manually operated shop tools for work on motorcycles, namely, carburetor tuning tool, tire irons, feeler gauge, carburetor jet wrenches, oil filter wrench, shock absorber wrench, axle wrench, and fork top nut wrench; and tool kits comprising pliers, spark plug wrench, knife, tire gauge, tire iron, sockets with wrench, screwdriver(s), wrench(s) and tire patch kitACTIVE—
018tool bags sold emptyACTIVE—
021work glovesACTIVE—
025t-shirts, uniforms, sweatshirts, hats, and glovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 30, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance