USPTO serial 85123089
THE RECIPE FOR HEALTHY LIVING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE RECIPE FOR HEALTHY LIVING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Jennison Shultz
KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ JENNISON & SHULTZ, P.C.2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | NUT AND SEED-BASED SNACK BARS; NUT-BASED SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, NUT CLUSTERS; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PROCESSED NUTS, SEEDS, DRIED FRUIT AND CHOCOLATE; DAIRY BASED FOOD BEVERAGE ALSO CONTAINING COCOA; TRAIL MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PROCESSED NUTS, SEEDS, DRIED FRUIT AND ALSO INCLUDING CHOCOLATE; PROTEIN BASED, NUTRIENT-DENSE SNACK BARS; AND PROTEIN BASED, NUTRIENT-DENSE SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |