USPTO serial 85123979
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
HORST M KASPER KASPER AND LAUGHLIN13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059-5832UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services, namely, cafeteria and restaurant services, fast food and non-stop restaurant services, restaurant carryout services, restaurant services featuring sandwiches, sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services, providing of food and beverages services for consumption on and off the premises, self-service restaurant services; bar services, namely, bar and cocktail lounge services, coffee and juice bar services, coffee-house and snack-bar services, dairy bar services, Table service in restaurants, meal serving in restaurants, dinner serving, beverage serving to guests | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |