Drawing for VIDA COCINA AND TEQUILA BAR

USPTO serial 85124356

VIDA COCINA AND TEQUILA BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDA COCINA AND TEQUILA BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul W. Garrity

PAUL W. GARRITY SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Bar and restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 22, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 10, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance