Drawing for SMART & SEXY

USPTO serial 85124480

SMART & SEXY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART & SEXY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq.

Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq. Moses & Singer LLP405 Lexington AvenueThe Chrysler BuildingNew York, NY 10174

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, lip gloss, lipstick, lip tint, lip pencil, lip liner, mascara, body glitter, foundation in the nature of base, blush, face powder, eye liner, eye shadow, eyebrow pencil, eyebrow powder, face and neck creams, body lotion, body cream; and Fragrance and perfumery in liquid, gel, cream and solid forms, namely, perfume, eau de perfume, toilet water, cologne; after shave, scented body sprays, body oils, shower gel, scented soap, face, foot and body scrubsACTIVE—
018Leather goods, namely, handbags, purses, wallets, card wallets, key wallets, brief cases, attache cases, overnight bags, suitcasesACTIVE—
025Footwear; Clothing for Women and Girls, namely, pants, tops, dresses, skirts, jackets, leggings, headbands, blouses, shirts, camisoles, shorts, sweaters, sweat pants, sweat shirts, T-shirts, shoulder wraps, shawls, coats, suits, vests, gloves, hats, scarvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 9, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance